The Beatles vs. Sublime

This one was sent in by Nicolas, Jessie and Michael.

The Beatles released “Lady Madonna” in 1968. I’m gonna guess that Sublime was busy shooting heroine heroin and listening to The Beatles while writing their soon to be hit “What I Got”.

The Beatles – “Lady Madonna” (1968)
Sublime – “What I Got” (1996)
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook

9 Responses to “The Beatles vs. Sublime”

  1. some person says:

    cool site
    this other site is helpful too:
    http://www.whosampled.com/
    in case anyone wanted to see music artists sampled from other artists’ songs
    not to be confused with “sounds like”, more like “copied from” lol

    [Reply]

  2. Nikki says:

    Sublime is still superior.

    [Reply]

  3. Stutz says:

    Not to be a d*ck, but “heroine” is a female hero. Heroin is a drug.

    [Reply]

  4. Rob says:

    First off, Bradley was shooting heroin, a narcotic, not heroine a female hero. Secondly half of Sublime’s songs were ripped off from reggae greats of the 70s. The Beatles were far more original. They also had many more songs. Somehow a cd of Bradley acoustic while nodding off doesn’t quite compare to the white album. Unless you’re a 16 year old at a pot party, then yeah, Sublime is perfect. Put it on right after Bob Marley Legend and right before Jack Johnson.
    If you’re interested in hearing what the awesome music Sublime ripped off was all about I recommend both the soundtrack and movie “The Harder They Come” both starring Jimmy Cliff.
    http://www.letmewatchthis.com/movie-13149-The-Harder-They-Come

    [Reply]

  5. Keith says:

    @Stutz

    Typo. My bad.

    [Reply]

  6. Kai says:

    And Lady Madonna sounds like Bad Penny Blues
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1-pQziWiKk

    [Reply]

  7. Frank says:

    There are a finite number of beats and progressions. It’s not possible to write something completely original, there will be parts of every song that sound like others. That’s what “influences” are.

    The important thing is doing the whole sound well, and if originality is your goal, doing the same beats or sounds in a new and interesting way.

    Every great musician will tell you, stealing isn’t stealing, it’s standing on the shoulders of giants.

    [Reply]

  8. Shaz says:

    Lol it sounds like OPM – Heaven Is A Half-Pipe aswell tbh

    [Reply]

  9. jack says:

    you cant copyright a chord progression, you can can only copyright a melody, so its in no way plagiarism, because the melodies are completely different, so much so that ive never thought to compare them because its such a simple two chord progression in otherwise complex songs (or at least complex in the beatles case). i would definitely not say what i got sounds like lady madonna…

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply